Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

First C&p For Diabetes And Coronary Artery Disease

Rate this question


JohnO

Question

First time post here. Greetings to all and thanks in advance for the help.

I am a Vietnam vet, served in III Corps in an assault helicopter company. I'm rated 0% right now, but am going for my first C&P on the 30th of this month.

My claim filed under Agent Orange is for Type II Diabetes with secondaries hypertension, neuropathy and coronary artery disease. This is how my VSR said to file. I'm not exactly sure why coronary artery disease cannot be considered separately given the recent IHD addition to the list of diseases covered under Agent Orange. Perhaps one of you will enlighten me about this.

I had a heart attack in '96. I have a stent and see a cardiologist 3-4 times a year, including an annual stress test. I have a neurologist that sees me twice a year for my neuropathy and my motor neuron disease. My family doctor treats my diabetes and hypertension.

My question is that I have two types of neuropathy or chronic pain. I've had chronic pain all over my body 24 hours a day since '89. Just the last three or so years, I noticed a new layer of pain in my feet, ankles and hands. My neurologist said that the "new" pain is diabetic neuropathy. Is diabetic neuopathy considered a secondary compliant to diabetes by the VA?

I have a complicated list of diseases and complaints. I'm unsure how to approach this hearing. What can I expect? Will I be throwing the examiner a curve if I talk about my chronic pain (been with me since '89) and my diabetic neuropathy that has been with me for three or for years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Welcome to Hadit.

Since you served in Viet Nam the C&P should be fairly routine.All of your concerns are valid and should be discussed. Symptoms of neuropathy as you have listed go part and parcel with Agent Orange and diabetes.

Good Luck

Edited by Pete53
Additional comment

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

When were you dx'ed with DMII? Your secondary conditions should all be dx'ed after the DMII dx in order to have smooth sailing for those secondary conditions. You can claim chronic pain due to PN. Just make sure you tell them the pain started after the official DX of DMII. DMII is the condition that underpins all your other claims and it should proceed them. After you get SC'ed for DMII and PN you should probably file a claim for chronic pain disorder and depression. I have been down this road you are on now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When were you dx'ed with DMII? Your secondary conditions should all be dx'ed after the DMII dx in order to have smooth sailing for those secondary conditions. You can claim chronic pain due to PN. Just make sure you tell them the pain started after the official DX of DMII. DMII is the condition that underpins all your other claims and it should proceed them. After you get SC'ed for DMII and PN you should probably file a claim for chronic pain disorder and depression. I have been down this road you are on now.

I had the heart attack before I was diagnosed with diabetes. Thanks for pointing it out.

It is hard to pinpoint specific dates. I remember my doctor watching for diabetes for years before I actually began taking metformin. Also, I was diagnosed with my motor neuron disease in 86, yet I began experiencing loss of muscle mass and strength years before that date. Again another date problem will be my coronary artery disease. I had my heart attack in '96 (or 95?) yet I remember signs of heart problems about the time I was diagnosed with the neuromuscular disease. I asked my neurologist at the time if I needed to worry about my heart and he told me to eat, drink and be merry because the neuromuscular disease was going to kill me. I'm still here, so I guess doctors can be wrong sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I'm not exactly sure why coronary artery disease cannot be considered separately given the recent IHD addition to the list of diseases covered under Agent Orange. Perhaps one of you will enlighten me about this."

As long as the CAD is directly due to the AO DMII-you might have better chance at a faster decision than using the IHD regs. Some Senator is going to hold the IHD regs up for months.

"My neurologist said that the "new" pain is diabetic neuropathy. Is diabetic neuopathy considered a secondary compliant to diabetes by the VA?"

Yes.

"I'm unsure how to approach this hearing."

A hearing???? You were denied at a SC rating higher then "0" for DMII????

I sure don't understand that.What ws the date of that decision?

Did the VA obtain every private medical record you had?

If you had DMII at a ratable level and were incountry Viewtnam, then the date of the past claim they denied on the DMII might be your retro date when Nehmer Court Order comes into play.

It is hard for me to be sure based on the limited info here.

I am just surprised they denied yo or do you mean they awarded you for DMII but only at "0" %?

Do you have someone on your POA who will be at the hearing with you?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I missed this before:

I had the heart attack before I was diagnosed with diabetes.

Do you have a vep rep? reason I ask is that if the etiology for the CAD was not the DMII then VA will not SC the heart disease.

However would your doctor be able to make a statement to support a claim of aggravation? That the DMII from AO aggravated the heart condition?

They would rate the percentage of what they would consider aggravation of a NSC condition (the CAD) due to an SC condition.

MANY Americans ,when having an initial heart attack, are then diagnosed with diabetes. It is one of the most undiagnosed conditions in the US.

My husband had a heart attack while employed at the VA. They misdiagnosed it as a sinus infection.

I proved years later it was a malpracticed heart attack.

I then proved fairly recently to VA that this initial heart disease was due to undiagnosed and untreated diabetes mellitus.

The word diabetes never once appears in his medical records.

Unfortunately OI believe (due to the extensive research I did to win those claims after he died, that any heart attack should be considered as potentially from undiagnosed DMII. A HBIAC test immediatelky after a heart attack cold be one good way of determining if in fact the CAD is drectly due to the DMII.

In your case)I read this so fast I missed something at first)in my opinion your claim should not only raise the NSC aggravation issueabove but also raise direct SC for the IHD due to the new AO presumptive regulations which are pending.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use