Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Claims Backlog Is Not 783,000 Its Still Over 1,000,000

Rate this question


Capt.

Question

Hello All, I am still confused that we keep getting fed with wrong numbers and information concerning the VA's backlog problem. As posted here in several articles the number of claims backlog keeps popping up at 783,000 by several agencies. I would like to put something to the board and look at this thing as it has progressed since 2009. Ok now the FACTS. According to VA Secretary Shenseki article posted 09-01-2010 at VA Watchdog.org he addressed an American Legion Conference telling those that the backlog was over 1,000,000 backlogged claims. and that VA was averaging 97,000 new claims every month. http://www.vawatchdog.org/10/nf10/nfsep10/nf090110-6.htm

OK , thats from the Secretarys own mouth. Now we see in ArmyTimes http://www.armytimes.com/news/2011/02/military-va-claims-backlog-021411w/ that the backlog is 783,000. We also see that in the watchdog.org article that claims average for decision , good or bad is 160 days. Its not hard to see that the math does not work and that the backlog is HUGE. Where did all the numbers go. Its not getting better, its getting worse as most of us have seen or experienced. Yes , its true that the roughly 3500 new adjudicators are also working on the AO cases since the new IHD presumptive were added this past fall, but not 300,000 to 400,000 less claims being adjudicated. This is really misleading and getting out of hand. Whether the VA is not counting those may be their reason for the discrepency in total numbers but it is not being added correctly, nor truthfully. The problem is still HUGE and getting worse.

Also in this week's Senate hearing , American Legion Director Tim Tetz http://www.legion.org/legislative/97265/legion-treat-root-va-claims-backlog said the way to save money and move the backlogged claims problem is to stop the C and P exams when a veteran already has a diagnosis from his VA doctors , or family doctors. AMEN. What a simple idea. Yes it would move claims and we would also have ACCURATE decisions and less BVA REMANDS. Oh yes but then comes the wonderful corruption of QTC and its billion dollar contract to assign C and P Exams. It is no wonder that CEO Princippi, past VA Secretary and Dr. Peake , a board director and another past VA Secretary himself are steering this. They are making alot of money. Unfortunately it is the veteran that looses and the Veteran is at risk again. For those of you who are mad and tired of the hamster wheel maybe by calling our Senators and Congressmen to support some type of legislation like Tim Tetz is suggesting needs to be put into a bill or law. Certainly the VA Senate and House Committee members would need to see this. Its just some thoughts I had and wanted to sound off on. I hope I did not step on someones feelings but this thing is out of control. NEVER GIVE UP. God Bless, C.C.

P.S. My hand hurts so bad

Edited by Capt.Contaminate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

I agree. While I am not sure how/why the VA gets away with manipulating the numbers, I can speculate that its 783,000 PLUS appeals, making it over one million, but dont take that one to the bank.

I do know that my 2004, 2008, and 2009 appeals are just now getting to the BVA.

Sometimes I think their idea of lowering the backlog is to go from

700,000 Veterans waiting 6 months for an initial decision and 300,000 waiting 4 years for an appeal decision to go

to 600,000 waiting 6 months for a decision and 500,000 waiting 6 years for appeals. That is, they approve more claims and double the number of appeals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Some of the "quick process" A.O. related claim forms, when filled out properly by a treating physician, do result in claim processing without a C&P.

Currently, the law & regs are such that if the claim is denied without a C&P, and the other conditions are met, a veteran can claim lack of "due process".

The real problem is that the RO's don't like to make a decision without a C&P.

I don't know if this is because the RO wants someone else to help bear the responsibility for a resulting decision, hope that the C&P might help deny a claim, or just delay it, and take the pressure of the RO for the moment.

Hello All, I am still confused that we keep getting fed with wrong numbers and information concerning the VA's backlog problem. As posted here in several articles the number of claims backlog keeps popping up at 783,000 by several agencies. I would like to put something to the board and look at this thing as it has progressed since 2009. Ok now the FACTS. According to VA Secretary Shenseki article posted 09-01-2010 at VA Watchdog.org he addressed an American Legion Conference telling those that the backlog was over 1,000,000 backlogged claims. and that VA was averaging 97,000 new claims every month. http://www.vawatchdo.../nf090110-6.htm

OK , thats from the Secretarys own mouth. Now we see in ArmyTimes http://www.armytimes...acklog-021411w/ that the backlog is 783,000. We also see that in the watchdog.org article that claims average for decision , good or bad is 160 days. Its not hard to see that the math does not work and that the backlog is HUGE. Where did all the numbers go. Its not getting better, its getting worse as most of us have seen or experienced. Yes , its true that the roughly 3500 new adjudicators are also working on the AO cases since the new IHD presumptive were added this past fall, but not 300,000 to 400,000 less claims being adjudicated. This is really misleading and getting out of hand. Whether the VA is not counting those may be their reason for the discrepency in total numbers but it is not being added correctly, nor truthfully. The problem is still HUGE and getting worse.

Also in this week's Senate hearing , American Legion Director Tim Tetz http://www.legion.or...-claims-backlog said the way to save money and move the backlogged claims problem is to stop the C and P exams when a veteran already has a diagnosis from his VA doctors , or family doctors. AMEN. What a simple idea. Yes it would move claims and we would also have ACCURATE decisions and less BVA REMANDS. Oh yes but then comes the wonderful corruption of QTC and its billion dollar contract to assign C and P Exams. It is no wonder that CEO Princippi, past VA Secretary and Dr. Peake , a board director and another past VA Secretary himself are steering this. They are making alot of money. Unfortunately it is the veteran that looses and the Veteran is at risk again. For those of you who are mad and tired of the hamster wheel maybe by calling our Senators and Congressmen to support some type of legislation like Tim Tetz is suggesting needs to be put into a bill or law. Certainly the VA Senate and House Committee members would need to see this. Its just some thoughts I had and wanted to sound off on. I hope I did not step on someones feelings but this thing is out of control. NEVER GIVE UP. God Bless, C.C.

P.S. My hand hurts so bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

No matter how many claims the VA is doing or not doing each month I don't think that affects the time frame of your individual claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No matter how many claims the VA is doing or not doing each month I don't think that affects the time frame of your individual claim.

Ahhh... I don't know about that John...

Three years ago I would have told someone that the average claim takes a year. Today I would tell someone the average claim takes two plus years... The number of claims in the system have to have some effect on the actual

processing time... otherwise why does it take twice as much time to get a claim throught the system.

Now my claim for the damage due to my eye during surgery was submitted in Dec 2008, I had a C/P exam in Jan 2010, then another C/P Dec 2010., and the decision 15 days after the last C/P, ( which was a rush decision and resulted in

an appeal). My point is that the va took twice as long to decide a claim than they did in 2008. In my case two C/P exams and they still did not address the root problem, and this even though they didn't need a C/P exam to make a decision..

Something stinks in Denmark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use