Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ro Remand Decision

Rate this question


Charleese

Question

Hi all,

My husband had his C&P exam on May 11, 2011 for his Left SC Knee, SC Neck that BVA granted him, lower back disability and TDIU. BVA remanded his claim back to RO for vareious issues as well as these 3 things. The exam also was 1 exam for these 3 things.

Today he received from RO a SOC & SSOC for the other various issues.

SOC stated that (1) SC for hypertensive heart disease as secondary to hypertension denied; (2) SC for diabetic eye (retinopathy) as secondary to diabetes mellitus denied; (3) SC for cholesterol (denied); (4) SC for erectile dysfunction denied; and (5) Entitlement to SMC based on loss of use denied. Evidence: Service treatment records from 10/54-10/58; Duty to assist letter dated 11/3/08; VA treatment records from 9/8/83-11/08; and VA joint examination dated 11-13-08. It looks like they went back to there decision in 2010 denying everything but didn't issue an SOC and therefore BVA remanded back to them telling them to issue an SOC. He wants to appeal this decision because his primary doctor in 2010 wrote a nexus letter connecting his ED to the mumps that he had when he was in the service. His SMR documents his having Mumps in the Service. This 2010 letter they failed to use in this decision.

SSOC states (1) Evaluation of status post fracture left tibial tubercle with osteoarthritic changes and chronic chondromalacia and left thigh atrophy, which is currently 30 percent disabling, is continued; (2) SC for right carpal tunnel syndrome denied; (3) SC for hypertension denied; (4) SC for diabetes mellitus denied; (5) SC for mumps denied; (6) SC for right shoulder condition as secondary to SC disability of recurent subluxation left knee denied; (7) SC for gout as secondary to SC disabiity of recurrent sublluxation left knee denied; (8) SC for left shoulder condition as secondary to SC disability of recurent subluxation left knee denied; (9) SC for left carpal tunnel syndrome as secondary to SC disability of recurrent subluxation left knee denied; (10) Evaluation of recurrent subluxation left knee currently evaluated as 30 percent disabling (didn't say denied/granted or continued); (11) SC for osteomyelitis (didn't say denied/granted or continued). Evidence: BVA Remand dated 9/20/11 (they mean 9/20/2010); VA Joints exam dated 5/11/11 and VA spine exam dated 5/11/11. He plans to appeal this as well but we will wait in see if they deny/grant TDIU first if we can before he appeals.

He has yet to receive decision for his TDIU, Left Knee disability, lower back and Neck. We thought he would receive this decision first since VA gave him a partial portion of his appeal and FAST Letter states: There is a "FastLetter" dated Jan., 6 2010 that states they need to implement the granted BVA portion "first" and then work the appeals. Here they doing the opposite. We hope that they will issue decision on TDIU, Left Knee disability, lower back and Neck before the 30 day period is up for appeal of SOC and SSOC. We have asked for copy of 5/11/2011 C&P Exam but in a letter received yesterday they say we need additional time to determine whethr the VA has this record, etc. Imagine our surprise today to see that they do have this record and used it in their SSOC decision. Do you think he will get this decision soon or not? Do you think it will be a favorable one or a not favorable one?

Thanks in advance for your replies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I used the date of a hospital admission as an EED for TDIU. I had to file an appeal to get it. It just so happened that the hospital admission date and my SSDI date are one and the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was already collecting regular Social Security before his last injury.

Does anyone know the answer to this: Will his left knee and right knee be considered bilateral now that they have SC right knee?

He already receives 60% for left knee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was already collecting regular Social Security before his last injury.

Does anyone know the answer to this: Will his left knee and right knee be considered bilateral now that they have SC right knee?

He already receives 60% for left knee.

Charleese,

With IU being granted - the SC percents for the knees will most likely be moot.

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

He was already collecting regular Social Security before his last injury.

Does anyone know the answer to this: Will his left knee and right knee be considered bilateral now that they have SC right knee?

He already receives 60% for left knee.

JMHO... YES. I have a SC right knee diagnostic code #5257, and a SC left leg amputation diagnostic code# 5165. I am looking at one of my an old 1987 VA "Rating Decision" award letters, also awarding me a "Bilateral factor of 4.6%...

It sounds like you all went on a VA roller coaster rating ride over the weekend. You have my sincere sympathies for that experience, (one I know only too well). This is so not fair to you all. Do you have the "granted TDIU" notice in hand yet???

Edited by Commander Bob

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hi all,

Hubby called his VSO to find out why his TDiU, Neck, Lower Back and left SC was not rated first. VSO said it was rated first and that he was granted TDIU, Neck, Left atrophy, and right knee. He stated that hubby should of received official letter by now.

That is an old VARO ploy. Maybe it was sent to the wrong address.... That's the excuse they gave me recently.LOL

Why doesn't your VSO find out why you did not receive the first letter instead of just telling you "it was rated first"????

What a world...

Cmdr. Bob

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

...Husband was so happy and kept asking him was he sure and VSO said yes he was sure. He told him his retro was back to May 2009 when he filed for TDIU. We were hoping that they would go back to 2008 when he stopped working because of his injury that they have now SC. He forgot to ask him how much percentage each was...

Where did your VSO get the info & why couldn't the vso send you a hard copy of what was being read to your Hubby over the phone?

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use