Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Iris Response

Rate this question


Papa

Question

I am going to change my name to Naive :rolleyes:. When I sent the IRIS out I thought that I had sent it to the Houston RO. But, apparently not :excl:. In this response they seem to think that the Oct 6th exam was only an initial exam, and I'm asking about future exams. I told them that this was the future or second exam for PTSD. My Attorney does not have anything on this, but is checking. According to the response I should have been notified. I love the part about the RO initiating a claim for me. God help me. I believe the only way they will do this is by someone forcing them to do so. If, they compare my twp PTSD reports it should be incresed from 30 to at least 70% JMHO. BTW, Houston rarely answers back.

Papa

This is in response to your inquiry to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) dated November 10, 2011.

VA will sometimes order a routine future exam to evaluate one or more of a Veteran's service connected conditions. This is generally done to ensure we have a current assessment of the disabilities, and the Veteran is receiving the proper amount of compensation. Upon completion of such an exam, a Veteran's disability percentage may be upheld, or it could be decreased or increased depending on the results of the exams. When VA initiates a routine future exam, the Veteran does not need to file a claim, as a claim will be initiated by the regional office.

In researching your records, we determined you were examined on October 6, 2010, for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The results were released to your regional office on December 5, 2010. However, with the information available to us, we were not able to locate information to indicate a routine future exam for PTSD was ordered. Therefore, we have forwarded a request for information to your regional office in Houston. Once we receive a reply to our request, we will contact you via this inquiry system to advise our findings.

Our records also indicate you have two claims and two appeals in process at this time. We have provided the status of each below, for your information.

We received your claim for increase on February 16, 2010, for multiple conditions. We received correspondence on August 26, 2011, for Parkinson's disease. However, we are not able to determine the status of your claims with the information available to us. Therefore, we have requested this information in our correspondence to your regional office.

We apologize we are unable to provide you with an immediate answer to your question, and appreciate your patience as we research these matters.

We received your Notice of Disagreement for an earlier effective date for Diabetes Mellitus II, on February 16, 2010. We received your Notice of Disagreement for Parkinson's disease on October 2, 2011. Our records indicate you elected to have your appeals reviewed by a Decision Review Officer at the regional office. Right now, your appeal is awaiting that review.

If we need additional information, we’ll notify you. If we don’t need any additional information, the Decision Review Officer will make a decision, and you’ll receive written notification.

Appeals are generally processed in the order received and are many in number. Additionally, an appeal may be delayed if there is a claim in process. As such, we are not able to advise when your appeals will be reviewed. We apologize.

Thank you for contacting us. If you have questions or need additional help with the information in our reply, please respond to this message or see our other contact information below.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

My latest response referred to a condition that I didn't even have. I think as agencies downsize/rightsize, we're going to see more of mis-distribution of services, lower paid, untrained/experienced employees, etc.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was told on an IRIS email response that I had to re-respond to that a message would be sent to my VARO for additional information. So, I'm surmising that just as the 800#, the IRIS go anywhere, then, if they can't find the information on the computer, they may or may not, contact VARO for further questions. That's the way it's been for me, but it doesn't really matter too much...still get the we're sorry this has taken so long (2 years now), but your appeal is awaiting an SSOC. LOL!! I have had to start laughing at this craziness because, otherwise, I must be the one losing it about this whole VA stuff, but it's not me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

800 # e-benefits and Iris have been no help to me either. This is used as a method for the Veteran to contact someone to get a status, but in reality neither of them are no help because they do not have a" hands on " regarding any of your information. They can't see your file, locate it, and basically have no knowledge what it is you are really asking.

Most of there responses are a copy and paste variety-all a quick and easy response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was called by Iris the other day and was informed that the rater looked up my claim for Increase and TDIU and Quoted "I was on Track" been almost 6 months in the Decision phase, time for me to stop

thinking about the claim and move on it will drive you crazy waiting. Happy Thanksgiving to you and your Families!

NJ

"Hang in there and Fight"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you are on track make sure that the train is cominhg

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use