Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Does Submitting New Claims Or Appealing A Claim Put Existing % In Jeopardy

Rate this question


COOL BREEZE

Question

I have been quite ill for a spell. Another spell in the hospital with another issue-the big D:Diabetes. I am trying to get back into the flow it on this site.

I have been reading numerous post from the face book page on the DAV . Quite a few veterans think that by submitting new claims or filing an appeal could jeopardize your current %. In other words, I am currently rated at 70%, they could decrease my rating at any time.

The varo could look at this and down grade me? I have a 60% for cardio issues. Don't see how they could determine an improvement with an enlarge heart with a 50 % ventricular.

Also, by submitting new claims or appeals that have nothing to do with the original claim could cause them to review my entire file.

I have an appeal with the local varo going going on since October of 2010. No movement. I don't expect anything to happen there for another 5-10 years or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA has 900,000 claims in the system and a lot more coming every day. It is my guess that every OIF/OEF vet is going to file a claim one day. Aging RVN vets with DMII and IHD will be filing. I don't think the VA does have time to readjudicate my seven claims if I file a new one next week. A TDIU claim is almost impossible to be reduced unless the vet has gone back to work full time. I have heard of 100% vets who suffer from mental conditions getting reuced due to their dumb actions of telling the VA they feel much better. I knew such a vet. When he found out what his big mouth had done he filed an appeal and got his 100% back after about a year. You need to use common sense when you file a new claim or for an increase. If you are getting 70% for PTSD and working at a decent job full time and have a decent home life it is probably not a good idea to file that PTSD increase. However, if youi are homeless and jobless it is a good idea especially if you have a recent hospitalization. I had eight claims granted after I got TDIU back in 2002 including P&T, a claim for an EED, and two SMC claims.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don'rt know what to say. I hope your posting does not come back to haunt you....

I'm past my 20 years for most claims.. but even so... I have nothing to worry about because all my claims are valid, and that is the key... no veteran should be worried if they are not trying to get over......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm past my 20 years for most claims.. but even so... I have nothing to worry about because all my claims are valid, and that is the key... no veteran should be worried if they are not trying to get over......

We don't condone submitting and or prosecuting any claims that aren't "valid"

or any claimant "trying to get over" .

The whole jest of this thread by the OP, is getting a bit tangled up.

The original concern of the OP -

"I have been reading numerous post from the face book page on the DAV . Quite a few veterans think that by submitting new claims or filing an appeal could jeopardize your current %. In other words, I am currently rated at 70%, they could decrease my rating at any time.

The varo could look at this and down grade me? I have a 60% for cardio issues. Don't see how they could determine an improvement with an enlarge heart with a 50 % ventricular."

has been replied to with varying opinions.

Bottom line is always that if medical evidence shows improvement VBA can certainly propose to reduce,

just that plain and simple - now whether they do it or not, would be up to them and then the vet can fight it if needed.

This is of course barring protection regs that cover the condition.

We can speculate yea or nea all we want - but if we want veterans and VBA claimants to be prepared

I find it best to include preparation for worse case scenario.

If the claims process ran as smoothly as some like to illude it does - - -

then there would be no need for any of us to be here.

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After much thought on this subject and by reading the pro's and cons, I filed an IRIS request to remove the claim. I will resubmit later after this current NOD which has many complex under and non rated issues. The response stated they will accept this to remove and notify the appropriate dept..

Recently you requested assistance from VA. Below is a summary of your request and our response.

This is in response to your inquiry to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) dated January 31, 2013.

Thank you for your service to our country.

At this time, we are asking your regional office (RO) in Phoenix to accept your inquiry as your 21-4138, Statement in Support of Claim, to cancel your current claim. Therefore, we have forwarded this request to your RO. The RO will review your file for the claim and take the appropriate action to cancel your claim.

We received your Notice of Disagreement (NOD) on October 6, 2010. You elected a review by a decision review officer (DRO). Right now, your appeal is awaiting that review.

If we need additional information, we will notify you. If we do not need any additional information, the DRO will render a decision, and you will receive written notification.

The processing of an NOD averages about 458 days. The length of time it takes to process your NOD depends on the specifics of your case and VA’s pending workload.

Please be advised, you can check the status of appeals, compensation, and pension claims, request letters, add dependents, update direct deposit and change of address through the eBenefits portal. This is a joint Department of Defense (DOD) and VA service that provides resources and self service capabilities to service-members, Veterans, their families, and caregivers.

Because eBenefits gives you access to your own personal information we must protect your privacy and your confidential information. We offer two levels of access: Basic and Premium. Additional information about eBenefits and the enrollment process can be found online at:

https://www.ebenefits.va.gov/ebenefits-portal/ebenefits.portal.

Thank you for contacting us. If you have questions or need additional help with the information in our reply, please respond to this message or see our other contact information below.

Sincerely yours,

C. Boyd
National IRIS Response Center Manager
www.ebenefits.va.gov

By phone:
(800) 827-1000
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) 711

By fax: (602) 627-3035

By letter:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Phoenix VA Regional Office
3333 N. Central Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85012


Edited by COOL BREEZE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully this is the right area to ask my question. I have been rated 80% for several years, with 60% for IHD and 60% for Prostate Cancer residuals. I was rated 100% TDIU about three years ago. I was informed by the VA recently that I now have diabetes which will require medication to treat. From the many postings I've read, I believe I fall in the 20% category for the Diabetes, which would push me to 90% total disabily, and 100% for TDIU. I asked my DAV rep and he said that I shouldn't apply for an increase in rating for it due to the possibility of getting lowered elsewhere. I don't believe it would change anything money wise, but I would like it in my records just in case something happens due to Diabetes. The VA found the Diabetes, so it is documented in my file. Would it be best to actually file a claim to include it, or leave well enough alone? This is all Agent Orange related. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use