Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

The package sat in the mailbox at Janesville...

Rate this question


CapnHaddock

Question

I need a sanity check...  I filed my first VA claim after being out of the service for over 20 years and was awarded 80% from the day I filed.  I then followed up with another claim that moved me to 90%.  In the mean time I appealed the denials from the first claim.  I am now 100% P&T (I am 63).  I have my good days and bad days but I am not going to complain.  This is my issue - I submitted an intent to file on the second claim and submitted it by overnight mail and can prove that it arrived and was ready for pickup on the morning of May 29th of last year.  That is the day my Intent to File expired.  My package sat in the box until it was picked up on the 30th and was then recorded as arriving on the 30th and the intent to file null and void.  I can prove this from the U.S. Post Office documentation.  I should not have waited to the last minute however that is another story.  I want to submit an appeal for the date of receipt.  Am I opening myself up for another set of evaluations and is this type of appeal even considered.  I have poured through the instructions and can nothing about date of receipt.  Does anyone have any experience on this?     

Old, but I'm not that old
Young, but I'm not that bold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Good Morning - I have reviewed the appeals process and it appears that the only way I can go about this is through an appeal to higher authority.  I submitted a letter with documentation as a supplemental to my claim last May addressing the delay at the Post Office.  They did not address the Post Office issue in the award letter which resulted in my moving from 80 to 90%.  However - they had the information.  By submitting the appeal to higher authority am I opening up the entire claim or just the issue of the award date?  In my request to higher authority I am going to only address the award date.  

Old, but I'm not that old
Young, but I'm not that bold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

CapnHaddock There is usually more than one way to approach the VA claims process. We way the different options carefully and then, hopefully, we make a decision that is the best for us personally. That is the strength of Hadit; to provide insight so you can make the best choices that will work for you. You have done that. And there is nothing that says you can't revisit the situation latter if things change. Good for you, and good luck going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

CapnHaddock quoted

'' am I opening up the entire claim or just the issue of the award date?''   you can appeal the entire decision if you so wish?

  if the 10% increase is ok with you  then don't appeal that,but you might check the rating creteria for that claim and make sure its just a 10%increase ? other wise it maybe more..>  just make sure... 

but if they say your EED date is incorrect Appeal that  especially if its your ITF  EED.

I NEVER HEARD OF THEM TO DENY  ON A ''POST MARKED CLAIM ENVELOPE'' ON THE DATE IT WAS DUE ...YOU CAN CHECK YOUR  C-FILE FOR THAT POST MARKED ENVELOPE.  you need this envelope bad that's your evidence for your INT RETRO.  ..NOW IF IT WAS POST MARKED ONE DAY AFTER YOUR CLAIM WAS DUE  THAT GOT CHA.  OR 1 MINUTE AFTER MIDNIGHT.

If your luck is like mine  it won't be in there....for obvious reasons.  but don't hurt to look.

  12 months of retro would be a nice hunk of change.

its nothing new,  to be late one day on an ITF  they are ''honorary  about our EED. and love to deny on just ABOUT ANYTHING THEY CAN .

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

CapnHaddock and Fat, I would say that VA will fight just about any claim for an EED. Even a claim form 80% to 90% to 100% over a years' time will result in quite a substantial retro payment. In some cases the rater didn't read enough evidence and in some cases the rater ignored the evidence. The veteran must decide to challenge the effective date or let sleeping dogs lie.  The thing would really be for the veteran to decide to fight the rating decision within one year because after a years' time the criteria for filing a CUE Claim is a lot harder to win and will take a lot longer. Some veterans are afraid of losing their benefits (which is not possible if their symptoms remain the same) and VA is very aware of that. VA has tried in the past to reduce veterans ratings when veterans file for increases and or corrected EED but the BVA has reverse those  decisions and stooped those reductions. 

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Buck - I checked and the letter I sent before the claim was completed pointing out their error is available on line in EBENEFITS!  I have all the post office tracking information in that letter and it also shows up in the file VA.GOV.  I have the receipt dates in which it was scanned into the VA system and the tracker they gave it.  It was mailed overnight three days before ITF expired.  They simply ignored it.  I have submitted the appeal - now we have to wait for the outcome.  

Old, but I'm not that old
Young, but I'm not that bold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use