Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Im having a good day....

Rate this question


brokensoldier244th

Question

  • Moderator

I just proved that a 23 yr old veteran likely had/has non-malignant parathyroid nodules and hypothyroidism due to exposure to HF radio as hull tech/damage control team for a 270 day cruise under 3.309 and 3.311. Two hours well spent. 

 

Hows your day going?

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

WOW!!!!!! we dont see much radiation exposure claims here:

Congratulations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think sometimes neither the veteran nor their rep,if they are having a hard time getting comp , specfically for a cancer service nexus ,-have any idea that the VA does have Radiation ( a.k.a Atomic vets presumptive regulations.

This is Great Broken Soldier.

I will find some BVA cases and post here= there are many types of inservice exposed to radiation.

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.309

"(d) Diseases specific to radiation-exposed veterans.

(1) The diseases listed in paragraph (d)(2) of this section shall be service-connected if they become manifest in a radiation-exposed veteran as defined in paragraph (d)(3) of this section, provided the rebuttable presumption provisions of § 3.307 of this part are also satisfied.

(2) The diseases referred to in paragraph (d)(1) of this section are the following:

(i) Leukemia (other than chronic lymphocytic leukemia).

(ii) Cancer of the thyroid.

(iii) Cancer of the breast.

(iv) Cancer of the pharynx.

(v) Cancer of the esophagus.

(vi) Cancer of the stomach.

(vii) Cancer of the small intestine.

(viii) Cancer of the pancreas.

(ix) Multiple myeloma.

(x) Lymphomas (except Hodgkin's disease).

(xi) Cancer of the bile ducts.

(xii) Cancer of the gall bladder.

(xiii) Primary liver cancer (except if cirrhosis or hepatitis B is indicated).

(xiv) Cancer of the salivary gland.

(xv) Cancer of the urinary tract.

(xvi) Bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma.

(xvii) Cancer of the bone.

(xviii) Cancer of the brain.

(xix) Cancer of the colon.

(xx) Cancer of the lung.

(xxi) Cancer of the ovary.

Note:
For the purposes of this section, the term “urinary tract” means the kidneys, renal pelves, ureters, urinary bladder, and urethra.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1112(c)(2))"
 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

There are a significant amount off rdiation claims at the BVA but many mny o them were denied. Here are two winners:

This recent award was to a female veteran who  Stated:

 

"At the October 2019 hearing, the Veteran reiterated the circumstances that she believed included exposure to radiation from Chernobyl radiation while stationed overseas in Germany."

 

 

:Accordingly, the evidence is at least in relative equipoise as to whether the Veteran's current breast and thyroid cancers originated during her active service. The benefit of the doubt is resolved in the Veteran's favor; service connection for breast and thyroid cancer are warranted. Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (1990); 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b); 38 C.F.R. § 3.102."

https://www.va.gov/vetapp21/files5/21029208.txt

This vet was exposed to Ionizing radiation :

" The Veteran's service treatment records (STRs) and military personnel records have been associated with the claims file. The Veteran's personnel records show that in February 12, 1960 he was assigned to Camp Hanford for "AIT" or Advanced Individual Training. This training lasted 1 month. These records also show that in March 1960 he was assigned a new duty, reflecting a change in rank after completion of AIT, at Hanford Camp. This new assignment lasted 8 months. See Record of Assignments, contained in the Military Personnel Record, associated with the claims file in July 2014. Thus, the Veteran's military personnel records show that the Veteran was at Hanford for 9 months, from February 12, 1960 until November 28, 1960. In other words, the Veteran was stationed at Hanford for more than 250 days. Additionally, the Veteran's cancer, characterized a pharyngeal cancer, is one of the cancers considered in the regulation. Accordingly, the Board finds that the Veteran participated in a radiation-risk activity pursuant to 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(d)(3)(ii)(E) due to his service at the Hanford site in Washington lasting more than 250 days and his pharyngeal cancer diagnosis. Thus, as the Veteran has been found to have participated of a "radiation-risk activity"; he is to be considered a "radiation-exposed" Veteran and his pharyngeal cancer is subject to presumptive service connection under 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(d). Accordingly, for the reasons explained above, service connection for pharyngeal cancer, to include associated residuals, on a presumptive basis is warranted, as the Veteran has been found to have participated of a radiation risk activity during service pursuant to 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(d)(3)(ii)(E). In reaching this determination, the Board has made no finding as to the current severity of the Veteran's cancer or any associated residual. However, the Board notes that the evidence of record suggests the Veteran has scars pertaining to the surgical interventions for his cancer, difficulty talking due to his surgeries, has experienced disruptions with feeding and has received his nutrition through a feeding tube due to his cancer residuals."

 

https://www.va.gov/vetapp21/files5/21029000.txt

 

These claims are very difficult to succeed in. I Here is more info from VA

https://www.va.gov/disability/eligibility/hazardous-materials-exposure/ionizing-radiation/

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Here is part of what I used to support it going to special routing in Jackson. What made me think of it is that I have a HAM radio and I hang around a lot with the storm spotters locally, and while their car rigs and handhelds aren't bad they always joke about their HAM shacks at home microwaving their brain. I had my HAM on today just to listen to the local repeater check in and it clicked "hey, wait a minute........."  and then I thought of that scene from the old 80s movie "The Philadelphia Experiment" where they are testing a new radar system and two of the guys disappear and are sent to the future (1984, ironically).

 

https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/radiation/diseases.asp 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.311 

Specifically XVII "non-malignant thyroid nodular disease"

 

Edited by brokensoldier244th

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I wonder if the VA will ever add the Fukushima  incident 

 U.S. Armed Forces Sickened After Fukushima Meltdown Get Help From Online Fundraising | HuffPost

and the Tomodachi incident involving US troops, ad well as the Fukushima incident 

Operation Tomodachi - Wikipedia

will VA  ever add them to their Radiation Risk Activity list...........

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Best way to get information about exposures is go to occupational safe and health request surveys done over the years! Those reports have a lot of information! They have case files on each shop!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use