Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Does Submitting New Claims Or Appealing A Claim Put Existing % In Jeopardy

Rate this question


COOL BREEZE

Question

I have been quite ill for a spell. Another spell in the hospital with another issue-the big D:Diabetes. I am trying to get back into the flow it on this site.

I have been reading numerous post from the face book page on the DAV . Quite a few veterans think that by submitting new claims or filing an appeal could jeopardize your current %. In other words, I am currently rated at 70%, they could decrease my rating at any time.

The varo could look at this and down grade me? I have a 60% for cardio issues. Don't see how they could determine an improvement with an enlarge heart with a 50 % ventricular.

Also, by submitting new claims or appeals that have nothing to do with the original claim could cause them to review my entire file.

I have an appeal with the local varo going going on since October of 2010. No movement. I don't expect anything to happen there for another 5-10 years or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

So you got an increase of 10% for apnea? How were they able to connect this to your previous claim?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool Breeze,

When a veteran submits a claim, he/she is opening their claim in its entirity. I know that there are some veterans that disagree with this, but I can tell you that they do. I inform each veteran that I see, when a veteran submits a claim, one of three things will happen; your disability will increase, stay the same or it could be lowered. Each veteran is different and each has their own set of circumstances.

You stated that you have 50% for cardio issues. If your heart is not getting any better, it would seem to reason that they would keep it the same, but it is va's call. I'll give you an example of what I mean. I submitted a claim for a vietnam veteran for Ischemic Heart Disease. He was initially rated at 60%. After the rating, his condition worsened and surgery was done. The doc's put 4 stents in. After the conveslence period, the va brought him in for a review and lowered his 60% to 10% because his testing showed that his heart was working more efficiently than prior to his surgery.

If you have an ongoing appeal, I would seriously recommend against submitting an additional claim. The only reason, I would submit a claim in this situation, is if the claim was for a condition that met either life of death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I'd second the statement that the VA considers the whole claim as subject to review. It's a pity that the review usually seems to extend only to things that the VA thinks it might be able to reduce. There are things about this that look to be extremely "one sided" and so forth. I'd take the stand that previously denied conditions should be included as well in a review.

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how to I contact the VA to disregard the new claim as I am unable to contact them- I have an appeal going on for 3 years for other non related issues that more in likely would affect my current compensation as it is only a NOD. And I guess what you are saying a new clam vs a nod would put me in risk. The VA would have to spend countless exams to exam my heart to see if the ventricular was greater than 50 % to reduce me. I had this done at a heart clinic not the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, I am so tired of the "scare tatics" that some think The VA employes.

A veteran can request service connection for a new issue and 99.9 % of the time the VA isn't going to relook at any other issue.

Look, the VA can relook at any claim they want to at any time, so if someone is afraid the va is going to reevaluate all their old issues when they request service connection for a new issue... just put the claim in, because the VA will do what they want to do regardless.

Also, if you need to submit a claim, and you have a claim pending ... it is ok to put in the new claim... Remember the when the va awards compensation the effective date is the month after the claim is submitted. If you wait for one claim to come back before you submit another claim, you stand to lose thousands, if not hundreds of dollars in compensation. The worse thing that can happen if you submit another claim before the first one comes back, is the the rating for the first issue is held up until the 2nd issue has been rated, however the va also has been known to issue a rating on one issue before a second issue is decided.

The only other thing I suggest is that if you submit a new claim, to submit all the medical evidence with it at the same time. By submiting the evidence up front, you could save yourself a lot of waiting time......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use