Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Does Submitting New Claims Or Appealing A Claim Put Existing % In Jeopardy

Rate this question


COOL BREEZE

Question

I have been quite ill for a spell. Another spell in the hospital with another issue-the big D:Diabetes. I am trying to get back into the flow it on this site.

I have been reading numerous post from the face book page on the DAV . Quite a few veterans think that by submitting new claims or filing an appeal could jeopardize your current %. In other words, I am currently rated at 70%, they could decrease my rating at any time.

The varo could look at this and down grade me? I have a 60% for cardio issues. Don't see how they could determine an improvement with an enlarge heart with a 50 % ventricular.

Also, by submitting new claims or appeals that have nothing to do with the original claim could cause them to review my entire file.

I have an appeal with the local varo going going on since October of 2010. No movement. I don't expect anything to happen there for another 5-10 years or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Teac,

got to disagree with you in so many ways!! Where do you obtain your information that "99.9% of the time va will not look at your other issues" That statement is totally wrong!

When a veteran submits a claim, they are opening their claim in it's entirity. I review any where from 60-90 rating decisions a month. I can tell you with a 100% certainity, the claim is reviewed in its entirity. I have seen % lowered due to this.

If a veteran has a pending claim and the veteran submits an additional claim, the pending claim goes back to the development phase and meets up with the new claim, then they begin the process all over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teac,

got to disagree with you in so many ways!! Where do you obtain your information that "99.9% of the time va will not look at your other issues" That statement is totally wrong!

When a veteran submits a claim, they are opening their claim in it's entirity. I review any where from 60-90 rating decisions a month. I can tell you with a 100% certainity, the claim is reviewed in its entirity. I have seen % lowered due to this.

If a veteran has a pending claim and the veteran submits an additional claim, the pending claim goes back to the development phase and meets up with the new claim, then they begin the process all over.

Well you can disagree all you want, were all free to express an opinion,

I was a DAV Service officer for some time, I submited many claims over that time, and I have been dealing with the va since 1986 in one way or another.. In all that time I have never seen or do I know of any veteran that received a reduction based on them placing a new claim for a new issue.... Frankly the VA doesn't have the manpower or time to do as you suggest. The only time any old claim is reviewed is when the veteran request it... I never said a claims file won't be reviewed, quite the opposite.. I said the va can review a file anytime thay want.. but that doesn't mean for one minute they are looking to reduce a claim.... and they just don't do it on a whim... it takes a lot of evidence to reduce a claim.

As i said , many times the va will rate a claim and continue working on another.. In my own case this has happened a few times in the last 26 years. That doesn't mean that all claims are held up because someone submits another claim, and it doesn't me that all claims are processed seperately either. I think it depends a lot on the rater, the claim, the evidence and the Regional office. Since I have dealt with 6 or 7 regional offices I have seen it all ways... you would think the va would follow a set standard but we all know they don't, and that is another reason why there are so many appeals, remands and claims that make it the the courts..

Just recently, a very good friend of mine had his claim come back at 90% with TDIU.. and he also had an appointment for a C/P this Past Tuesday, he was concerned. Today he called me and indicated that the RO had requested a c/p exam as a way to look to give him a 100% rating and A&A. According to my friend the doctor indicated he should be rated 200%.. so this is a good indicatation that he will receive another increase.... This is one instance were his claim files was totally reviewed, but based on the TDIU claim he asked for it.

I don't know why you say you are reviewing 60-90 claims a month...and I don't know what your are looking for when you review a file, however, unless your a rater you may have some inside information that I am not aware of....

There are very few reasons ( that I am aware of) to review a complete claims file if a veteran submits a new issue.. For example if a veteran is rated for asthma and then submits a claim for COPD that would be a good reason to review the old asthma related claim.. However if a veteran submits a claim for hemorrhods and there is nothing in the past that was rated that could lead to hemorrhoiods then why whould a rater waste time reviewing the entire file.

Over the years I have submitted so many personnal claims 48 was my last count... and not once was any of my disabilities ever reviewed unless I requested a review. And many more times people told me exactly as you have said.. Don't put a new claim in unless it concerns a life threating issue, or until your old claim comes back. I am here to tell you if I listened to guys like you.. my claim for A&A, Housing grant, auto grant and a host of other issues would have never been awarded

Now maybe I am a lucky cuss.. but many of my claim actions were appeals, of which I have won 2 cue cases, and a number of de novo appeals, as well as a claim that went to the BVA so again maybe I am lucky..

Now I do have a very good friend that worked for the VA at Fort Bragg, that retired a few years back... at he and I spoke quite a bit... he said he could not help laughing at some of the horror stories, another good friend works in that office also as a DAV represenative.. he has seen way more than me since I have been out of the business for a while, but from what he tells me.. the don't have the time to relook at each and every file when a new claim hits the desk.

Technically, you are correct when a claim is submitted by a veteran and that veteran has placed claims in the past ( and that includes any action disability claim or not), the claim is considered re-opened by the VA. On its face.... that is misleading.. Most Veterans consider a re-opened claim that is really a claim that has been rated in the past and the vet is looking for a higher rating, a new claim is one where a veteran has never placed a claim on a specific issue.

I am voicing an opinion based on my 26 years experience dealing with the va first as a veteran, and then as a veterans advocate... I doubt I have all the answers and I doubt I have seen all the issues.... but I just the same I think I have a good understanding of what happends.......and although I have no reference to cite, I doubt you have any either..... but I've been wrong before....

I stand by my opinion 99.9 % of all claims will never be re-evaluated based on someone claiming a new medical issue.

If a veteran submits a valid claim he should not be afraid that he/she will lose any rating that was already awarded.. and I know from first hand experience that your kind of advice scares veterans, and some never put the claim in because of that type of advice.... For a while I even beleived this garbage, until I learned otherwise.. and realized that I was scaring veterans too..

Finally, what do you tell a veteran when one approaches you and tells you he took your advice and waited to put a claim in... and then he tells you that he lost two or there years of compensation because of what you told him....

I think we will just have to agree to disagree..

Edited by Teac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"When a veteran submits a claim, he/she is opening their claim in its entirity. I know that there are some veterans that disagree with this, but I can tell you that they do. I inform each veteran that I see, when a veteran submits a claim, one of three things will happen; your disability will increase, stay the same or it could be lowered. Each veteran is different and each has their own set of circumstances."

I agree with Meg. Pigs get fat. Hogs get slaughtered. You have to go with your heart.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you can disagree all you want, were all free to express an opinion,

I was a DAV Service officer for some time, I submited many claims over that time, and I have been dealing with the va since 1986 in one way or another.. In all that time I have never seen or do I know of any veteran that received a reduction based on them placing a new claim for a new issue.... Frankly the VA doesn't have the manpower or time to do as you suggest. The only time any old claim is reviewed is when the veteran request it... I never said a claims file won't be reviewed, quite the opposite.. I said the va can review a file anytime thay want.. but that doesn't mean for one minute they are looking to reduce a claim.... and they just don't do it on a whim... it takes a lot of evidence to reduce a claim.

As i said , many times the va will rate a claim and continue working on another.. In my own case this has happened a few times in the last 26 years. That doesn't mean that all claims are held up because someone submits another claim, and it doesn't me that all claims are processed seperately either. I think it depends a lot on the rater, the claim, the evidence and the Regional office. Since I have dealt with 6 or 7 regional offices I have seen it all ways... you would think the va would follow a set standard but we all know they don't, and that is another reason why there are so many appeals, remands and claims that make it the the courts..

Just recently, a very good friend of mine had his claim come back at 90% with TDIU.. and he also had an appointment for a C/P this Past Tuesday, he was concerned. Today he called me and indicated that the RO had requested a c/p exam as a way to look to give him a 100% rating and A&A. According to my friend the doctor indicated he should be rated 200%.. so this is a good indicatation that he will receive another increase.... This is one instance were his claim files was totally reviewed, but based on the TDIU claim he asked for it.

I don't know why you say you are reviewing 60-90 claims a month...and I don't know what your are looking for when you review a file, however, unless your a rater you may have some inside information that I am not aware of....

There are very few reasons ( that I am aware of) to review a complete claims file if a veteran submits a new issue.. For example if a veteran is rated for asthma and then submits a claim for COPD that would be a good reason to review the old asthma related claim.. However if a veteran submits a claim for hemorrhods and there is nothing in the past that was rated that could lead to hemorrhoiods then why whould a rater waste time reviewing the entire file.

Over the years I have submitted so many personnal claims 48 was my last count... and not once was any of my disabilities ever reviewed unless I requested a review. And many more times people told me exactly as you have said.. Don't put a new claim in unless it concerns a life threating issue, or until your old claim comes back. I am here to tell you if I listened to guys like you.. my claim for A&A, Housing grant, auto grant and a host of other issues would have never been awarded

Now maybe I am a lucky cuss.. but many of my claim actions were appeals, of which I have won 2 cue cases, and a number of de novo appeals, as well as a claim that went to the BVA so again maybe I am lucky..

Now I do have a very good friend that worked for the VA at Fort Bragg, that retired a few years back... at he and I spoke quite a bit... he said he could not help laughing at some of the horror stories, another good friend works in that office also as a DAV represenative.. he has seen way more than me since I have been out of the business for a while, but from what he tells me.. the don't have the time to relook at each and every file when a new claim hits the desk.

Technically, you are correct when a claim is submitted by a veteran and that veteran has placed claims in the past ( and that includes any action disability claim or not), the claim is considered re-opened by the VA. On its face.... that is misleading.. Most Veterans consider a re-opened claim that is really a claim that has been rated in the past and the vet is looking for a higher rating, a new claim is one where a veteran has never placed a claim on a specific issue.

I am voicing an opinion based on my 26 years experience dealing with the va first as a veteran, and then as a veterans advocate... I doubt I have all the answers and I doubt I have seen all the issues.... but I just the same I think I have a good understanding of what happends.......and although I have no reference to cite, I doubt you have any either..... but I've been wrong before....

I stand by my opinion 99.9 % of all claims will never be re-evaluated based on someone claiming a new medical issue.

If a veteran submits a valid claim he should not be afraid that he/she will lose any rating that was already awarded.. and I know from first hand experience that your kind of advice scares veterans, and some never put the claim in because of that type of advice.... For a while I even beleived this garbage, until I learned otherwise.. and realized that I was scaring veterans too..

Finally, what do you tell a veteran when one approaches you and tells you he took your advice and waited to put a claim in... and then he tells you that he lost two or there years of compensation because of what you told him....

I think we will just have to agree to disagree..

Thanks for saving me a lot of typingsmile.png

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use