Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

New C & P Exam For Heart Disease

Rate this question


vern2

Question

This is 28 April 2015 results of my C & P exam for heart disease. I have been trying since 2003 to get SC for heart disease. I had 6 tests less than 6 months after came off AD

DBQ CARDIO Heart:

MEDICAL OPINION REQUEST

TYPE OF MEDICAL OPINION REQUESTED: Aggravation of a nonservice

Connected disability by a service connected disability.

OPINION REQUESTED: Aggravation of a nonservice connected disability

by a service connected disability.

Was the Veteran's atrial fibrillation and ischemic heart disease

At least as likely as not aggravated beyond its natural progression by his/her

Service connected hypertension with pulmonary hypertension?

Discussion of above question: The above question requires that the

Atrial fibrillation and ischemic heart disease exist prior to military

service and be aggravated by his hypertension. His atrial fibrillation

did not occur until 2013 and proof of ischemic heart disease until

2015, occurring long after his military service, and therefore this

does not seem to be the appropriate question. If we stay with the

above question the opinion is that his atrial fibrillation and ischemic

heart disease were not aggravated by his hypertension and pulmonary

hypertension.

The more appropriate question is whether the atrial fibrillation and

atrial flutter are secondary to the hypertension with pulmonary

hypertension.

Opinion: It is at least as likely as not that the atrial

fibrillation/atrial flutter/ischemic heart disease are secondary to

his hypertension and pulmonary hypertension.

Rationale: The veteran had long-standing hypertension that began

During his military service. He is service connected for hypertensive heart

disease. Hypertensive heart disease damages the muscle and electrical

system of the heart which can lead to atrial fibrillation and atrial

flutter. Hypertension also damages the arteries which causes the

cholesterol to adhere and cause ischemic heart disease. It is

therefore logical and in agreement with his cardiologist's opinion that the

hypertensive heart disease caused his atrial fibrillation/atrial

flutter and also his ischemic heart disease.

****************************************************************************

in 2003, and results showed had hypertensive heart disease, yet rater only rated me for aggravated hypertension. Been on various appeals since 2007.

This exam seems more favorable than prior exams. Any thoughts? I am currently rated 30% for hypertension.

I am trying to get 60% at least for the hypertensive heart disease.

Vern 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Thanks GP, I am 67 and she is 73, and been married 34+ years. She is great wife! We are both retired and I volunteer at NAVY HOSPITAL PENSACOLA with Red Cross (Quarterdeck).

Vern 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I filed FDC 2/14 after getting VA DX of PH after Echo, claimed Secondary to SC CAD from 2008. Realized shortly thereafter that my CAD wasn't the correct Nexus but my Secondary SA, SC 2010 was most likely the cause. Meanwhile, my VA Cardiologist ordered all the Pulmonary function Tests and everything was ruled out as a cause except Sleep Apnea. Around 05/14 I filed another PH FDC with my SC SA as the cause.

End of May I have a C & P for the 2/14 claim. The VA Dr and I started discussing the PH and I told him about my thinking that the CAD was wrong and SA was actually the cause. He agreed and completed the DBQ stating no direct linkage to CAD. BUT THEN, says if I ask him to complete a DBQ regarding my SC SA and it being the "CAUSE" of my recent PH DX, he would be obligated to complete it right then, per VA Regs. Worked for me, Rated SC for PH @ 0% (Raters's Error), Secondary to SA end of 07/14. Before May, I was hoping to get a 50% to get past my 90% SC. Little did I know that my 41/2 yr wait on 1st NOD's DRO Hearing would take place 6/27/14 and all issues would be awarded including IU back to 2011.

Even though I'm IU, I'm still addressing the PH SC % issue with an eye towards SMC Aid & Attendance.

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use