Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Increasing Narcolepsy Rating

Rate this question


scottishere99

Question

I have a few questions I'm looking at trying to increase my Narcolepsy rating and I'm trying to figure out what all i will need.   I already have 10 people that i work with whom are retired military and military members that have told me that they will write statements  to me falling asleep at work 5 to 7 times a day along with my wife's statement.  i was told that i dont need a Nexus letter when trying to increase a rating, so what would i have my Neurologist that's  been treating me the past 8 yrs. last question is when i was going through my VA appointment's (all done by civilian doctors) i had not noticed a mistake until last year, the mistake is when i was asked about the minor seizures i told the doctor i experience between 5 to 7  a day but last year i noticed that he had put 5 to 7 a week.  the difference from 40% to 80% disability.  I understand i should have reviewed the paperwork after receiving my disability letter in 2009, and I'm not looking to get back pay just want to get the rating i should have gotten with the right wording that should have been put in the report.  this is so confusing and i dont have the money for one of these law offices to take my case.  So I'm hoping with all the knowledge in this group i will at least get steered on the right track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

scottishere99 The good news is you have the rating s-c, so you don't have to obtain a nexus. Several Buddy letters are a good start on getting the increase you need.Obviously, your current symptoms have to meet the criteria for an increase. Berta posted a resource back on 1-6-17, but it is gone; maybe she could re-post or add to this string. You don't say what your rating is, but I assume your current rating for Narcolepsy is at 40%.  But whatever the situation is, if you can't work, then you should also be considering IU. If your appeal gets to a combined rating of 70% and you meet the IU criteria, you should be putting in for that if the VA doesn't start the process as they should. This is an easy claim to appeal the rating, but not necessarily an easy one to win. Your comment about not being able to afford a lawyer, though, is a little misguided. You're looking for a big increase in a disability rating on a not too common illness. If you hire a lawyer and they win, it will cost you about 20% of the BACKPAY. That is not going to be coming out of your pocket, it is a piece of new money coming in. You should talk to a few lawyers and see a)if they are interested in taking your case IMHO. If they are, then you have a reasonable expectation they can win; they don't take cases they expect to lose. B) if they don't want to take your case, find out what they think in addition you need to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Yes that link would not open GBA, for me either , but there are many claims decisions at the BVA for this disability-many more recent than that one in the 2017 link.

And I agree with you as to the 40%.

"As for minor seizures, the General Rating Formula for Major and Minor Epileptic Seizures provides that a 10 percent evaluation is warranted for a confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy with a history of seizures; a 20 percent evaluation is warranted for at least two minor seizures in the past six months; a 40 percent evaluation is warranted for averaging at least five to eight minor seizures weekly; a 60 percent evaluation is warranted for nine to 10 minor seizures per week; and an 80 percent evaluation, the maximum for minor seizures, for more than 10 minor seizures weekly. 38 C.F.R. § 4.124a, Diagnostic Code 8911. Note (1) to the general rating formula states that when continuous medication is shown necessary for the control of epilepsy, the minimum evaluation will be 10 percent. This rating will not be combined with any other rating for epilepsy. 38 C.F.R. § 4.124a, General Rating Formula for Major and Minor Epileptic Seizures, Note (1)."

 

https://www.va.gov/vetapp20/files3/20018187.txt

Scottishere-I am unaware of whether these ratings changed since you got the 2009 decision.

Do you get 40% now for this? Both I and GBA are assuming you do.

You said:

 

 "the mistake is when i was asked about the minor seizures i told the doctor i experience between 5 to 7  a day but last year i noticed that he had put 5 to 7 a week.  the difference from 40% to 80% disability.  I understand i should have reviewed the paperwork"

What triggered the doctor to put that into the record? Was this another C & P exam?

Have you filed a claim for a higher rating?

If you get less than 40% now I feel those co worker's statements will help you and I also feel maybe your private doctor might be able to write a brief IME to bolster your claim. 

 

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
6 hours ago, Berta said:

Yes that link would not open GBA, for me either , but there are many claims decisions at the BVA for this disability-many more recent than that one in the 2017 link.

And I agree with you as to the 40%.

"As for minor seizures, the General Rating Formula for Major and Minor Epileptic Seizures provides that a 10 percent evaluation is warranted for a confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy with a history of seizures; a 20 percent evaluation is warranted for at least two minor seizures in the past six months; a 40 percent evaluation is warranted for averaging at least five to eight minor seizures weekly; a 60 percent evaluation is warranted for nine to 10 minor seizures per week; and an 80 percent evaluation, the maximum for minor seizures, for more than 10 minor seizures weekly. 38 C.F.R. § 4.124a, Diagnostic Code 8911. Note (1) to the general rating formula states that when continuous medication is shown necessary for the control of epilepsy, the minimum evaluation will be 10 percent. This rating will not be combined with any other rating for epilepsy. 38 C.F.R. § 4.124a, General Rating Formula for Major and Minor Epileptic Seizures, Note (1)."

 

https://www.va.gov/vetapp20/files3/20018187.txt

Scottishere-I am unaware of whether these ratings changed since you got the 2009 decision.

Do you get 40% now for this? Both I and GBA are assuming you do.

You said:

 

 "the mistake is when i was asked about the minor seizures i told the doctor i experience between 5 to 7  a day but last year i noticed that he had put 5 to 7 a week.  the difference from 40% to 80% disability.  I understand i should have reviewed the paperwork"

What triggered the doctor to put that into the record? Was this another C & P exam?

Have you filed a claim for a higher rating?

If you get less than 40% now I feel those co worker's statements will help you and I also feel maybe your private doctor might be able to write a brief IME to bolster your claim. 

 

 

 

 

Yes I've been at 40% since 2009,  that was my initial va exam when I got out it was with a civilian Dr. 

 No I haven't filled a claim for higher ever.  I know that I have people that will verify that I will fall asleep 5 to 7 times a day just at work let alone 3 to 5 times at home, has been this way since 2009.

I've been waiting for my service medical records for over 1 1/2 years and the last information I got on that was it would be out to me in May well August and still nothing.

I'm now on 2 of the strongest medicines for treatment and I still fall asleep at least 5ctimes a day at work or the same at home so that would put me around 30 times a week on the low side.  I've also have  missed work on 3 occasions this year due to not being able to wake up to go to work.

So what would be the best way to go at this? i have my old and new sleep studies, my Dr will write me a buddy letter or this IME you mentioned , and I have officers and retired military along with enlisted that will do a buddy letter approximately 30 people to write letters. (Would 30 be an over kill).  With out my medical record and time expiring from when I put the notice I was going to submit a claim in September of 2019. Should I submit what I have and see what happens or get a firm to take on my case?  

I'm only asking for advice and help in the direction of what to submit how to submit and if I do it my self and its denied can I still retain a firm to try again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes, if it is denied you can submit a supplemental claim, providing you have new and relevant evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, GBArmy said:

Yes, if it is denied you can submit a supplemental claim, providing you have new and relevant evidence.

So should I send all thenewreports on my new sleep exam this time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

You send everything that supports your contention that supports a worsening of your symptoms. I assume you never submitted buddy letters before, so yes, your wife should and you especially; how does this effect your work, with others at work and socially. If you go for IU, you want to start to build evidence about your issues at work, family and others socially. How about people in general. Any issues  about staying employed because of all the time you lose? etc. maybe a couple more. !0 is overkill. Get your doc to comment on your now current conditions as they compare to higher ratings. How it affects you at work. sleep exam is good; does it support your position and was done by a certified tech or whatever? It might result in you not having to do it again for the VA. At least is is evidence that they have to consider. As you already know, if denied,they will say why and you go from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use