Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 1

Hypertension (high Blood Pressure) Va Ratings

Rate this question


USMC_HVEQ

Question

I took the liberty to put up the VA ratings for HTN (Hypertension aka High Blood Pressure). This might help some people with questions. I think if you take all your readings from the past and present and put into a spreadsheet with dates and places then take an average of all the readings. If it falls into these categories, then that can help substantiate your claim, but this is just my opinion, so don't go crazy if your case is different.

7101 Hypertensive vascular disease (hypertension and isolated systolic

hypertension):

Diastolic pressure predominantly 130 or more............................................................. 60

Diastolic pressure predominantly 120 or more............................................................. 40

Diastolic pressure predominantly 110 or more, or; systolic pressure

predominantly 200 or more............................................................................

....... 20

Diastolic pressure predominantly 100 or more, or; systolic pressure

predominantly 160 or more, or; minimum evaluation for an

individual with a history of diastolic pressure predominantly 100

or more who requires continuous medication for control......................................... 10

Note 1: Hypertension or isolated systolic hypertension must be confirmed by readings taken two or more times on at least three different days. For purposes of this section, the term hypertension means that the diastolic blood pressure is predominantly 90mm. or greater, and isolated systolic hypertension means that the systolic blood pressure is predominantly 160mm. or greater with a diastolic blood pressure of less than 90mm.

Note 2: Evaluate hypertension due to aortic insufficiency or hyperthyroidism, which is usually the isolated systolic type, as part of the condition causing it rather than by a separate evaluation.

Note 3: Evaluate hypertension separately from hypertensive heart disease and other types of heart disease.

Semper Fidelis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I dont think they ever will John.But you never know so best to file.

Hypertension is the most common form of stroke and can be secondary to hypertensive heart disease.

VA loves to say in med recs, ' the veteran's HBP is " essential" meaning no known cause.( VA BS, it always has a cause)

But a strong IMO can SC it to AO IHD as secondary with evidence of hypertensive heart disease and even the med recs themselves might support the HBP to IHD without an IMO.

I was checking something I posted here--- 1151 HBP, under CUE

They denied on March 4, 2015, I CUed them and they awarded on April 2, 2015  stating they re-opened a previous claim on March 27,2015,but it was my March 27, 2015 CUE claim via IRIS and email to the Director (they only listed that email as evidence) that prompted the award and VA even  referenced the reg I cued them on, 38 CFR 4.6.

My husband had AO IHD awarded in 2012 (Nehmer) but I realized when I read this HBP award yesterday that they stated the veteran had "hypertensive vascular disease." VA had never stated that before.

I guess maybe all ischemic heart disease is in fact hypertensive heart disease....our cardio Guru here,  John Basser would know.(jbasser)

This was a 1151 medical error HBP award that was part of my FTCA case and then part of the 1998 decision I cued.It was the fourth or 5th CUE in that decision.

My long point to you is that with some medical excerpts from a good medical site that show IHD causes Hypertensive vascular disease ,and specifically HBP, you may not even need an IMO at all.And the term 'hypertensive heart disease' might even be stated in your med recs. 

I would sure file the claim.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

My best advise to anyone who is service connected for hypertension, is to immediately start a claim for heart disease secondary to hypertension.

The VA will not make to association on there own.  Trust me, I know.

I just claimed and won heart disease (LVH) 30% (2016) secondary to hypertension 0% (2008).  They VA had the evidence at the time, but I was too specific when making the claim.  From now on all my claims will be scatter shot.  Let them consider all that is related.

Even though I think they should have done the "connect the dots" when I made the claim for hypertension, they didn't.  

"duty to assist" is really "duty to resist" when it comes to the VA.

Bottom line is hypertension causes heart disease.

Just sayin,

Hamslice

 

 

“There is no hook my friend. There's only what we do.”  Doc Holiday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I am already 60% for CAD secondary to DMII.  I have NSC sleep apnea and HBP.  I feel doomed and all I am concerned about is making sure my spouse gets DIC and there is no way in the world for VA to slip out of that obligation.  I am already P&T for 15 years so I know she can get DIC, but she is woefully ignorant of VA tactics and rules.  I want there to be no doubt that AO killed me.  If I don't die from the OSA the other AO things will get me.  Maybe I should study up on how to get the OSA service connected because I don't think I will wake up one morning.  The high blood/DM11/heart disease combo is not helping me to live to be 90 years old.  If you combine OSA, HBP and all my service connected issues I am dead man walking and I want the *&^^% VA to pay for it.

 

 

                              John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am  a little confused on this matter.

Yes since hypertension causes heart disease & or related to it.

File on it today!

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

John999, why is your CAD secondary to DMII? CAD is the same as IHD and IHD is a presumptive of AO.

 

IHD 30%SC

DMII/ED 20%SC SMC for ED

Tinnitis 10%SC

Hemorroids0%SC

Bilateral Hearing Loss0%SC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use