Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Glaucoma Secondary To Dmii

Rate this question


john999

Question

Husband just received a decision granting glaucoma as secondary to his DMII, noncompensable. It says VA exam clarification is needed to fully evaluate this condition. Upon receipt of this evidence this evaluation will be reconsidered. A noncompensable evaluation is assigned unless there is a significant impairment of vision. He had a C&P eye exam. He's been seeing a private opthalmologist for his glaucoma and must use drops everyday to control it. He doesn't have significant vision loss so far. We read in the schedule of ratings for 6013 Open-Angle glaucoma that the minimum evaluation if continuous medication required is 10%. Does anyone know about this?

He was granted an SMC K award for ED secondary to diabetes, so that's good. They ignored a request for increase in DMII rating and hypertension secondary to DMII. We sent a letter asking them to reconsider these. They scheduled a C&P exam for TDIU. He has 20% DMII and !0% PN in each leg now. He takes insulin several times a day, episodes of low blood sugar, has a lot of problems with his legs and feet, fatigue, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Phillip is correct. Taking insulin shots should be rated at 40%. Also, if you can afford it, see a private neurologist about his PN. Most VAMC's are still using old testing equipment whereas private Drs are using modern,more sensitive, equipment. I was tested by both. The VAMC test showed mild PN. 2 months later, private testing showed moderately severe PN in both upper and lower extremities. Antiquated vs state of the art equipment.

But the most important thing is his heart. You mentioned fatigue. DMII can affect the heart as well. Get him to cardio for a thorough exam.

Edited by johnjjr

SEMPER FI

ONCE A MARINE, ALWAYS A MARINE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you guys for the information. We will get him checked out by some private doctors. He was surprised that the VA found that the PN was just mild in his legs when he has so much pain and other symptoms. Also, they didn't even check his arms. We'll get his heart checked out too. He has dizziness and fatigue. We're going to pursue the 40% for diabetes because he takes insulin and he has a doctor statement that states that he must be vigilant with his activities due to low blood sugar episodes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

AV

Can you get a second opinion on the Glaucoma from a private doctor? I went from 0% to 60% rating on heart condition because I asked for more testing and appealed. My problems are secondary to DMII. I would keep appealing these ratings and get more testing via your PCP or private source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know a lot about the DMII...

With that said, I have Pigmentary Glaucoma which was the resulf of a cataract surgery at the va. I was awarded 30% for the cataract seconday to steriod use for my lung disease. When I clamed intermittent light perception (blindness) and glaucoma as well as other issues I was told the 30% is the max for eye conditions unless you are totally blind or blind in one eye( and the rating is based on the one good eye) I was recently told by a va employee that under the new rating guidlines cataracts will no longer be rated at 30% but 0%. I have appealed the latest denial and I am trying to get a K award for the intermitttent blindness as well as compensation for the other issues.

My point is that maybe since the award for cataracts was changed, ( and I haven't seen the change in writing yet) that the award for other eye issues may have also been changed....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use