Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Tdiu Inferred But Not Wanted.

Rate this question


K9MAL

Question

I had a DRO hearing regarding 2 EED (Earlier Effective Date) issues and 2 ratings that I wanted to have increased. I'm currently waiting on the DRO's decision. I did not request TDIU but noticed last night on eBenefits that my contention is now listed as TDIU. I only want my ratings to be judged by the evidence that they have and do not want an inferred claim of TDIU. How can I prevent being labelled IU? Will not filling out a 21-8940 suffice? It doesn't sound like it when you read the quoted below.

My reasoning is that I would like to continue to have the freedom to try to engage in substantial gainful employment, if at all possible, and to the best of my abilities in the future. I do not want to be harnessed by the VA’s rules regarding IU and wish to pursue a career where I can find a balance between my injuries and my employment.

However, a veteran is not required to file this application form before the VA is obligated to consider and adjudicate a TDIU claim. When a veteran files an original claim for evaluation of a disability or a claim for an increase in the evaluation of a disability that has already been rated by the VA, the claimant is generally presumed to be seeking the highest benefit allowable. See AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 38 (1983); see also Roberson v. Principi, 251 F.3d 1378, 1383 (Fed. Cir. 2001); Norris v. West, 12 Vet. App. 413, 421 (1999).

Equally, when a claimant or the evidence of record reasonably raises a an informal claim for TDIU, the Secretary must furnish the claimant the form (VAF 21-8940) as prescribed by the Secretary. (38 C.F.R. 3.160)

***The VA Decision/Notification Letter should at least include a VA form 21-8940 as an attachment.***

If the VA has failed in compliance of any of the aforementioned on a failure to infer a claim for TDIU, then the veteran may have a basis to file a Clear and Unmistakable Error (CUE), these are very specific allegations of error, that are essentially a facial, and collateral attack on VA, and are given no deference via the VA's "duty to assist", nor is there ANY application of reasonable doubt doctrine (38 C.F.R. 3.102).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

iceturkee

The rating board looked at your employment history and determined you could be not retrained and Inferred your clain to IU even though you were rated at 60%

They awarded you IU because you could not do the job you was trained for & because of your disability at 60% & if you filed for increase and with your new medical evidence must have shown your disability as got worse so since you can't do the job you was trained to do they award the 100% if they did not use the extra scheduler.

Normally if the veteran is rated 60% and they usually up the rating 90 % useing the extra scheduler, they rated you at the 100%rate.& IU because you met the VA criteria as being TDIU.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Your issue is largely moot. Here is why:

If you are working, then you wont be awarded IU.

Also, since you are 80 percent and have sought an increase, there are two possibities

1. You get your increase to 100 percent schedular, and then IU will be moot.

2. You DONT get your increase to 100 percent schedular so, now:

A. If you do get awarded IU, then you can revoke it if you find work.

B. If you do not get awarded IU, then its moot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Your issue is largely moot. Here is why:

If you are working, then you wont be awarded IU.

Also, since you are 80 percent and have sought an increase, there are two possibities

1. You get your increase to 100 percent schedular, and then IU will be moot.

2. You DONT get your increase to 100 percent schedular so, now:

A. If you do get awarded IU, then you can revoke it if you find work.

B. If you do not get awarded IU, then its moot.

I'm not working presently, only attending classes. One of the biggest things I'm confused about is do they look at the increase in percentages first (NOD), the inferred IU claim first, or is it in tandem? If they can award the IU claim do they just blow off looking at increasing the percentages to make it schedular?

I'm trying not to beat a dead horse but from Gastone's post it would appear that they can award IU and then the person can continue to fight for the increased percentages at the BVA level and beyond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

To Whom it may concern: Earned Income and IU? Earned Income and 100% SC Schedular Limits? Vocational Rehab and IU Claim? 70-80 & 90% SC and relationship to unemployability?

A Vet rated as IU can have up to the current VA "Gainful Employment Income" level of $12,???.00 per year and still maintain his/her's IU Rating. This figure is after allowable deductions. If the Vet is self-employed or working in another type of shelter employment, his income above the $12K VA figure may be classified as "Marginal Income" and still not result in losing the IU Rating. Up until the Vet is 70 yrs old, he must report his yearly income. The VA is supposed to send out an income verification letter near the aniversary date of the IU Award and/or cross check IRS records.

A Vet rated at 100% SC Scheduler can earn the Sky's the Limit $$$. A Vet can be rated as IU and continue to file comp claims and/or NODS. IU is always a temporary rating until you've held it for the 20Yrs or turned 70, even if the award state "Total & Permanent with no future Exams scheduled." If a IU Vet earns above the "GEI" for 12+ months, his IU rating is up for grabs. Can't recall ever reading about a 70+ Vet getting reduced. What happens if you get your 100% Scheduler rating while IU, from a NOD or new claim? The monthly comp check stays the same, you might get more RETRO if it's due to a NOD Decision.

While the SC rating of 70-90% indicate a serious disability picture, they don't automatically indicate Unemployability. A Vet could have a great number of low % SC Conditions that might not, by themselves be a job killer. That's why a claim has to be filed. The VA DRO I had, stated that a large number of Vets file for IU and get denied because their either simply currently unemployed or under- employed and not due to their SC conditions.

VA Vocational Rehab and IU. You won't get denied IU just because your in the Voc Rehab program but the rater is supposed to review your Voc Rehab File. Your Councilor's statements regarding your current SC conditions and how they are affecting your progress with the Voc Rehab Reemployment Program can greatly assist or possibly hurt your IU claim. The VA Rater's and C&P Drs are not employment specialists. The Voc Rehab Councilors are the VA's trained professionals "Masters Degrees minimum requirement" and their assessment of your being Individually Unemployable or not, can make or break a IU claim.

Do you live in a State that has a 100% or IU rated Vet Personal Property Tax Exemption??????????????

Semper Fi

Gastone

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

iceturkee

The rating board looked at your employment history and determined you could be not retrained and Inferred your clain to IU even though you were rated at 60%

They awarded you IU because you could not do the job you was trained for & because of your disability at 60% & if you filed for increase and with your new medical evidence must have shown your disability as got worse so since you can't do the job you was trained to do they award the 100% if they did not use the extra scheduler.

Normally if the veteran is rated 60% and they usually up the rating 90 % useing the extra scheduler, they rated you at the 100%rate.& IU because you met the VA criteria as being TDIU.

the ortho doc who did my c&p said my back cdisability was not going to get better, only worse and said it precluded me from working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I put in for IU back in May of last year and when everything was said and everything was finalized in December 2014. The VA granted me 100% scheduler as things were shocking but the outcome was good. They gave me increases for a few conditions that were claimed and gave me IU for the first 6 months of 2014. I am glad that things turned out this way because it just gives me more options for the future. Do you research and seek advice and help from the wise. Just my situation and claim. Good luck

The power of life and death is in the tongue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use