Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Proposed Reduction from 100% to 40%

Rate this question


VietNamVet1969

Question

What is advisable to do following the receipt of this letter of proposed reduction in disability rates?

 

After 3 1/2 years and just visiting an outside, C&P doctor, (QTC Medical), I received a letter from the VA to reduce my 100% temporary disability. 3 1/2 years ago I underwent a radical prostatectomy, (surgery removing all they could find of prostate cancer).  A week after visiting this outside doctor that the VA ordered, came this reduction letter. When I read the conditions under which the VA can reduce a disability it reads as follows:

1. The VA must determine whether there has been an actual change in the disability since the last rating decision.

Prior to surgery my PSA reading reached a high of 5.6 and for the last 3 1/2 years there has been only the very slightest of changes varying from  >0.10 and <0.10 and nothing more or less than these numbers and symbols on myhealthevet.

2. The VA must determine whether there has been an actual change in the disability since the last rating decision

Again, only the slightest changes, as above, have occurred since my surgery

3. The VA must outline the time period during which the condition is said to have materially improved

I cannot find in their letter any specific range of time for improvement. Directly below is their letter in full without actual dollar amounts:

We have enclosed a copy of our rating decision for your review. It provides a detailed explanation about our proposal, the reason for it, and the evidence considered.

We have reviewed medical records concerning your service-connected conditions and noted some improvement in your Malignant growth of genitourinary system. Based on this evidence,we are preparing to reduce your prior evaluation of its overall disabling effect. The combined evaluation for all of your service-connected disabilities will drop from 100% to 50%. This proposed action does not affect your entitlement to treatment for service-connected conditions. We propose to reduce your monthly rate of compensation from $$$$ to $$.

We have reviewed medical records concerning your service-connected disabilities and noted some improvement. We propose to reduce our evaluations of the disabling effects for conditions as follows

        Malignant growth of genitourinary system    100%    40%

Please keep in mind I have a 5" scar, which was re-measured at this outside C&P exam, ED and incontinence at 5-6 Depends daily and the same number of bathroom visits nightly.

What's my next step? If I've missed anything just ask please

 

Edited by VietNamVet1969
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If everything is as you say regarding the wording from your VA staff (Doctor, or?), and it is in your file with the other recent evidence, it would appear you have a good chance. I assume to are rated 100% TDIU; if so, then if your over 55 years old, and you can't work due to your disabilities, then if the C&P examiner says that your rating will continue at 100%, I would suggest that you ask him/her if you could now be considered for P&T. You have nothing to lose since you just got a confirmation your rating would continue IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Further, the rating for the genitourinary system - renal dysfunction in your case would seem to call for a 60% rating. When they decided to rate you 100% it didn't really matter but if they are going to drop the one rating to 40% then it does now. 38 CFR .115a. They would either have to combine the two or at the least rate the higher of the two. I would argue that since the renal dysfunction has NOT changed that the rater must either consider it to maintain the 100% or address it seperatly if they are droppng the 100%. I have little experience with the situation but that is something I would certainly note in any NOD. Just my thought here.

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
51 minutes ago, GBArmy said:

If everything is as you say regarding the wording from your VA staff (Doctor, or?), and it is in your file with the other recent evidence, it would appear you have a good chance. I assume to are rated 100% TDIU; if so, then if your over 55 years old, and you can't work due to your disabilities, then if the C&P examiner says that your rating will continue at 100%, I would suggest that you ask him/her if you could now be considered for P&T. You have nothing to lose since you just got a confirmation your rating would continue IMHO.

Yes I think we are in agreement on everything stated. I am a retired Federal employee, over 70, the staff is a nurse practitioner, and it was sent by a veterans service officer locally. And I will follow your direction at the final determination to be considered for P&T, permanent and total, thank you sir

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use