Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Denied for claim in 2000 but reinjured in 2008

Rate this question


Kuwaitin08

Question

I had submitted a claim for a back injury in 2000 when I originally got out of the Army. It was denied because I was a turd and the claim was less than solid.

In 2008, I reinjured my back during my deployment. 
 

I tried to do a claim for a new injury in 2008 but it was rejected saying I needed to appeal my original back claim in 2000. Of course, none of my new evidence supported my claim 8 years prior so it was sure to be denied which it was.

Im completely stuck on how to submit a claim for the new injury in 2008. VSO’s in my area are worthless.

Any ideas/suggestions?

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Kuwaitin08 One of the problems I see often with the VA is that once a claim for a particular disability is denied, the VA is blind in one eye and can't see out of the other when it comes to appeals. They have a tendency to ignore new evidence and/or past evidence. If the facts are as you said you injured your back and made the claim less than 1 year of discharge, the VA makes that presumptive now. Don't know when they started doing that so you have to see if you have a legal argument on that. Just because it isn't found to be presumptive, doesn't mean it can't be s-c though. Was it documented; did you get copies of your STR's? And, if you reinjured again in 2008, hopefully you were a little more careful and you have your STR's for that event. So, bottom line, you were denied for not being s-c. You need to get a new current diagnosis on your back condition, and get a good IMO from a doc that knows VA-speak. You need a strong diagnosis or this is going to be 3 strikes. Get the disability, then you can see if you can connect back on a EED for 2000 or 2008. You didn't have continuity on processing your claim, so your only chance would be a CUE event. But don't fret about that now, just get this granted first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

'I'D SEE A SPECIALIST and have him to read your medical records  and examine you and ask him to give his medical opinion  to what caused this back injury  and he needs to state I have read this veterans medical records and examine him, it is my medical opinion this veterans back injury is likely as not  incurred while he was in the military, describe the event in question (what happened that caused your injury)     ect,,ect,,

This should be a fairly easy to prove if this back injury happen to you while in the military  or LOD 

Then you reinjured  your back while you were deployed    they should be a medical record on this  you need to get these records.

You should be able to keep your date  the date you first filed  especially if you filed for this Injury  one year from your discharge   thats all in your favor.

Dig up your service records. request your C-file...if you don't want to work your own claim  Hire a Experience level headed VSO  or VA EXPERINCE Attorney   now that you been denied  you can hire an Attorney/VA Claims Accredith Claims Agent.

It could be possible your attorney fees will be paid by the VA..  Elder member and hadit Mod ,BRONCOVET can chime in on that  he knows how the veteran can get his attorney fees paid by the VA.

IF AND WHEN YOUR SERVICE CONNECTED AND GIVEN A RATING , YOU STAND TO RECEIVE A HEFTY AMOUNT OF BACK RETRO PAYMENT. 

Get on this ASAP.

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 6/22/2021 at 7:16 AM, Buck52 said:

'I'D SEE A SPECIALIST and have him to read your medical records  and examine you and ask him to give his medical opinion  to what caused this back injury  and he needs to state I have read this veterans medical records and examine him, it is my medical opinion this veterans back injury is likely as not  incurred while he was in the military, describe the event in question (what happened that caused your injury)     ect,,ect,,

This should be a fairly easy to prove if this back injury happen to you while in the military  or LOD 

Then you reinjured  your back while you were deployed    they should be a medical record on this  you need to get these records.

You should be able to keep your date  the date you first filed  especially if you filed for this Injury  one year from your discharge   thats all in your favor.

Dig up your service records. request your C-file...if you don't want to work your own claim  Hire a Experience level headed VSO  or VA EXPERINCE Attorney   now that you been denied  you can hire an Attorney/VA Claims Accredith Claims Agent.

It could be possible your attorney fees will be paid by the VA..  Elder member and hadit Mod ,BRONCOVET can chime in on that  he knows how the veteran can get his attorney fees paid by the VA.

IF AND WHEN YOUR SERVICE CONNECTED AND GIVEN A RATING , YOU STAND TO RECEIVE A HEFTY AMOUNT OF BACK RETRO PAYMENT. 

Get on this ASAP.

The problem is not with the evidence. I have the documentation that shows the injury that occurred in 2008. The problem is that I am unable to submit a new claim with that evidence.

Because a claim was made back in 2000 for the same body part, the VA requires that I either appeal it or complete a supplemental for that injury. The evidence I currently have from 2008 is not considered new and relevant evidence because it occurred after the date of the initial claim.

so my problem is that I am stuck. I cannot submit a new claim with the evidence in hand because I’m not allowed to open up another claim with the same body part.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

What did you Claim in 2000? your back injury/? and did they service connect it  but at 0% ? same body part ?  you  injured your  Back ? before 2000  while in military, and you file a compensation claim  in 2000  was denied then you waited 8 years to reconsider this claim? 

 if you took no action in 2000    and then 2008 came and gone  and you never contested anything  on this claim? if yes   then your claim is considered closed.

   you need to either file a reopen claim with new evidence   in the supplemental claim lane , you will lose your EED BACK TO 2000 when you file a Reopen claim, if you never contested this claim  back injury you hurt while in military...  your EED WILL START WHEN THEY RECEIVE YOUR REOPEN CLAIM.  UNLESS YOU CAN PROVE CUE was committed back in 2000

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
44 minutes ago, Buck52 said:

What did you Claim in 2000? your back injury/? and did they service connect it  but at 0% ? same body part ?  you  injured your  Back ? before 2000  while in military, and you file a compensation claim  in 2000  was denied then you waited 8 years to reconsider this claim? 

 if you took no action in 2000    and then 2008 came and gone  and you never contested anything  on this claim? if yes   then your claim is considered closed.

   you need to either file a reopen claim with new evidence   in the supplemental claim lane , you will lose your EED BACK TO 2000 when you file a Reopen claim, if you never contested this claim  back injury you hurt while in military...  your EED WILL START WHEN THEY RECEIVE YOUR REOPEN CLAIM.  UNLESS YOU CAN PROVE CUE was committed back in 2000

In 2000 I claimed a back injury. It was a very weak claim and was denied as it should’ve been. I never appealed it at all.

I attempted to file a new claim for a back injury from 2008 but the VA will not allow me to do it because I had submitted a back claim back in 2000.

They claim that I have to appeal the old claim. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

My opinion.

You are very much in the ball game.

You filed in 2000, but was denied. You didn't continue the appeal.

You need to file a supplemental claim with new and relevant information to get the claim reopened.

I will assume you have a documented in-service incident, but probably a current diagnosis, residuals for rating purposes, and a nexus connection wasn't present.

First, if the in-service incident is present, we will focus on service connection.

 

1. See a orthopedic back doctor and let them do a CT-Scan or MRI to properly diagnosis your back issue.

This should satisfy the requirement for current disability.

 

2. Next, have him document by DBQ the limitations the back issue causes.

The DBQ is on line.

 

3. Last, ask for an opinion on the in-service incident connection to the current back issue.

You don't need a letter just a medical statement, "after reviewing all medical records, the back issue is more likely than not" related to the in-service incident/complaint.

Make sure the doctor has availability of all medical records related to the back.

Military and civilian.

 

All of the information is considered new/ relevant and should allow the claim issue to be reopened for service connection and rating purposes.

 

It may seem daunting, but medical evidence is undeniable by a specialist in that medical field.

🤠

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use