Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Good News

Rate this topic


JohnO

Recommended Posts

I just received a new award letter. This was in response to C&Ps triggered by my original claims dated May 28, 2010. The new letter is confusing. I hope someone can help me out.

My last award was noted at the beginning of this thread. It totaled 70%, with TDIU 100% awarded. The 70% is broken down as follows:

30% ALS

30% Coronary Artery Disease (Agent Orange)

20% DMII (Agent Orange)

10% Tinnitus

I'll share information on the ALS award in the ALS forum.

My new C&Ps were for my original ALS claim, peripheral neuropathy of all four limbs related to either my motor neuron disease (ALS) or to DMII, and sleep apnea.

The front page of my awards letter states the following:

$2,919 start Jul 1, 2010, original award

3,239 start Apr 1, 2011 Special Monthly Compensation Adjustment

2,919 start Jul 1, 2011 Special Monthly Compensation Adjustment

3,023 start Dec 1, 2011 Cost of Living Adjustment

3,354 start Feb 1, 2012 Special Monthly Compensation Adjustment

The $3,354 is from the 12/1/2011 Special Monthly Compensation Rate Table. "S" rate for veteran with spouse is $3,255. Another $99 is added from same table, "K" award. The explanation for the $99 addional award is that it is "usually added to another rate...when (the) percentage is zero." I do not know what this means.

July 1, 2010 is the start date of my original award, claim filed May 28, 2010

April 1, 2011 is the date my CAD award went temporarily from 30% to 100%, I had quintuple bypass surgery. I was awarded 3 months at 100%.

July 1, 2011 my CAD was lowered back from 100% to 30%.

February 1, 2012, SMC adjustment, my CAD was increased from 30% to 100%. This is based on a January 19, 2012 filing on my behalf by the Paralyzed Veterans VSO at Houston Regional. I will give more detail on this below.

I filed for an increase in my CAD award from 30% to 70% based on my stress test and other cardiac tests indicating that my ejection fraction was within the limit for the 70% award. I was denied this increase on July 1, 2011 because I filed insufficient evidence supporting my claim. My cardiologist simply wrote a letter to the VA stating that I was under his care and that my METs and ejection fraction warranted a 70% award.

I had two C&P exams triggered by the Paralyzed Veterans letter dated January 19, 2012. Both were scheduled within 8 weeks. There were some claims on my original filing (May 28, 2010) that had not been C&P'd or that required addional information or followup. Included in my two C&P exams were the following:

Neurological exam for possible ALS or other neuromuscular or motor neuron disease

Exam for peripheral neuropathy, claims filed for all four extremities.

Sleep apnea

hypertension

erectile dysfunction

I was awarded the following adjustments to my original claim:

50% Sleep apnea associated with ALS

30% right arm peripheral neuropathy, also claimed as diabetic neuropathy associated w/ DMII

20% left arm peripheral neuopathy, also claimed as diabetic neuropathy, associated w/ DMII

20% left leg peripheral neuopathy, also claimed as diabetic neuropathy, associated w/ DMII

20% right leg peripheral neuopathy, also claimed as diabetic neuropathy, asso. w/ DMII

100% ALS, minimum award for this diagnosis

Lumped in with the PN awards were erectile dysfunction and hypertension. No amounts were given for these two but the VA acknowledged the two diseases.

---------------------

Based on what I've written above, any advise about how to proceed?

I've got to say that from the start, my claims filings and my exams have gone smoothly. From start at 0% on May 28, 2010, to my award of 100%, letter dated July 30, 2012, I'm satisfied with the VA's efficiency and handling on my claims. I started with the Myrtle Beach clinic to file my initial claims, did my initial C&Ps at Charleston, had initial claims review by Columbia, had my files transfered to Houston Regional, and have used DeBakey VA Hospital in Houston as my primary hospital. I have no complaints.

Edited by JohnO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Congratulations, John!

USAF Active Duty 1988-1994

Security Police - Law Enforcement Specialist

Thank you all for your service to our great nation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Don't go out with money burning in your hands and buy an expensive toy. Wait a few months after you get the retro and let it cool down. Consider what it is like to have multiple thousands in the bank and how that can aide your sleep. You are practically a capitalist.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Great news Houston VARO has a well deserved reputation for sucking.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use