Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Secondary effective dates on granted/closed bva appeal

Rate this question


raidertone

Question

My question is should I be worried that the varo added my lung issues as secondary to graves disease in regards to possible retro money? 

I've had breathing and thyroid issues, along with a list of other things since my desert storm days.

My appeal had been ongoing since 2004 and recently granted and closed by Bva.

For some crazy reason they gave me a 2017 effective date for graves disease and a 2004 date for my  breathing issues secondary to graves. I don't get it. They are to separate issues.

So am I going to get retro back to 2004 on the breathing issues?

By the way, I haven't got my award letter yet, just going off of ebenefits info.

Screenshot_20200703-231646_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20200703-231729_Chrome.jpg

Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Got my letter today. They did give me the 2004 effective date for my breathing issues. Even though my overall rating didn't increase, I am going to receive some substantial retro. Good news 👍

Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I got a remand on my sleep apnea to reopen my claim.  I was told it was at the Appeals Management Center in DC.  First submitted for sleep apnea in 2007, again in October 2013 (when it was certified this time).  Still waiting.  My sleep apnea started in 1988, it was not mentioned in my medical records, because we did not know what sleep apnea was.  What are my chances that they will grant it.  I have lay letters from individuals who were sleeping in my area onboard ship and they wrote letters too.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

My remand required me to get a Compensation and Pension Exam.  It was scheduled and I attended.  I even showed up early and had filled out the five or six questions they wanted me to answer prior to coming to my scheduled exam.  I retyped all of their questions and provided the answers to them on a separate sheets of paper.  I put the font in bold and enlarged the pitch so it could be read easier.  The examiner only asked me 2 questions and thanked me for typing my answers so they could be easily read.  Remember this exam was for a remand for my Sleep Apnea appeal.  Sleep studies had already been done, so I did not know how they were going to do a C&P based on Sleep Apnea.  One question was "did I still use my CPAP Machine and I answered yes.  The second question how it effected me for work.  I told her that I sometime fell asleep at the wheel of my car once or twice before I arrived home.  She said, well that's all I need and thanked me for coming it.  This whole exam lasted less than 15 minutes.  But when I finally got a copy of my results, I noticed that she wrote that it was "Less likely than not that my sleep apnea was caused by my service in the Navy.  How can she do that after only 15 minutes or less?  More importantly, when she sends my exam back to the BVA after completing their remand instructions, are they going to just go by what she wrote or take everything into account....my buddie letters, my family letters, doctor reports, sleep study results.  I have been waiting since 2007 and 2013 for this.  Any suggestions or speculations on how this will be played out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Unfortunately from what the examiner mention in his/her report  its highly unlikely you will be service connected for Sleep apnea.

you may need to appeal this if your denied  and go get a qualified Dr to give his medial opinion after he reads your service records & EXAMINE YOU FOR SLEEP apnea  or the symptoms YOU REPORT FROM MILITARY   IT is likely as not your OSA WAS /AND RELATED TO YOUR MILITARY SERVICE.

Remember they don't doubt you have osa/sleep apnea  they VA are big on evidence that you must show by documents and medical records as your prebative evidence that you has some type of osa  or sleep problem while in the military.

now if you have other service connected conditions    some of those conditions can  be secondary to your osa.  you would need to file a secondary claim for osa   such as PTSD.

IS IS MOSTLY IMPOSSIBLE TO GET OSA direct service conneted without evidence  or medical records  that shows you had this osa or sleep problems with in military

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Sleep Apnea Kinda hard to say. What did the remand ask the RO to do: determine if it was S-C, or to determine the extent of your symptoms/conditions? If it was to determine if it was s-c, caused while you were in the service, the examiner said less likely than not. You have other supporting evidence, including buddy letters talking to it occuring while in service. That MAY be enough to appeal. But, if you do, you might see if you can get an IMO from a specialist that opines that it goes back to your service time. Additional evidence. Of course, you may still get a favorable decision from the BVA. Buddy letters, more than one talking to first hand observations is pretty powerful. You got a good shot, but who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use