Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dependent Eligible for earlier compensation

Rate this question


add55p

Question

Hello All,

In 2015, I was awarded a 40 percent rating with an effective date of April 2010.

At the time of the April 2010 effective date, my dependent child was above the age to be claimed for compensation.

After a long battle for an earlier effective date, the Department of Veterans Affairs granted me an affective date back to February 1999.

February 1999, my dependent child met the age requirement to be added for compensation purposes.

Within 30 days of receiving the earlier effective date (1999) award, I submitted a request to be compensated for the past period that my dependent child was eligible.

Within one month, the claim went to notification and then returned to under review. It has since been closed as of July 22, 2021 .

On Ebenefits, in the DEPENDENTS Section, it now shows a tab that says "show dependents not on Award". When I click on it, the following message appears;

"You are not currently receiving additional benefits for the dependents shown below". My dependent child that I submitted the claim for name and birthdate are shown below that message.

Can someone tell me what this VA communication could possibly mean concerning the outcome of my dependent claim.

The decision letter is on the way, per va.gov claim status.  

Thank you in advance.

Add

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator
42 minutes ago, add55p said:

The decision letter is on the way, per va.gov claim status.  

Well put nothing past the VA. I suggest waiting for your new award letter. Based on your post it is likely that the VA has sent you a separate award letter that should have the difference of your dependent pay on it.  In your post, you stated that the VA awarded you an EED back to 1999 and that would have made your dependent eligible for dependent pay and the VA should have included that pay in your decision. It is possible that your new letter will show this difference and at the same time, it is possible that Ebenefits shows that you have no dependents because your dependent child is still beyond the age limit.  Keep in mind that Ebenefits is supposed to show the current rating and your dependent child would not be on it because the child is well over the age limit. This would have nothing to do with an award letter for an EED for back/retro pay for your dependent. 

Back in 2014 the VA granted me a 2004 EED and I received my award letter and back pay. A few days later I received a second award letter for my dependent child that they left off. In 2019, the BVA granted me a 1998 EED that made my dependent child eligible for an EED and this time all my back/retro pay was included in my award letter, and I did not have to file a new claim. It is just a little too soon to know but your new letter may correct that they missed your dependent child off your award.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Adminstrator

It is hard to say without the letter being here.  Because you child is too old now it could me for now, but maybe in the letter there is wording for the back pay of the dependent.  There really is no way to know without the letter.  It says CURRENTLY, this would be correct as they are too old.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Advice provided makes sense. You won't know until you receive the award letter, and then go from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Pacman is right on with this question-

Part of my AO IHD death award certainly granted dependency to our school age child.

But then again she had already been listed as his dependent, when he wat only at 30%.

You said " Can someone tell me what this VA communication could possibly mean concerning the outcome of my dependent claim."

I have two answers-they are possibly working on that issue- but they might request from you proof that the child was in school, not an adult, at time of the EED date, and fulfilled the dependency criteria-I fill find and post that here-

my Second answer is they might not even be working on it because they might be illiterate.

I base that on over 25 years of personal experience with the VA as a claimant.

But I agree with all above, to wait for the actual decision.

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

"If you receive a combined disability rating of at least 30%, we’ll automatically consider your eligibility for additional compensation for your dependent."

https://www.va.gov/disability/add-remove-dependent/

*The again you would think they could have considered this when they determined the EED.

You might also need to file a CUE claim on this----but the decision will reveal what to do next.

I need to add- when the AO IHD claim was awarded my husband by then had been dead for 16 years , and my daughter had served by then 7 years in the Military-

but still they had to go back to the EED etc etc and include for her dependency allowance, because the AO IHD claim changed everything- 

I dont think that was part of the retro but it involved a CUE SMC award too-

Am I reading this correctly:

You said:

"Within 30 days of receiving the earlier effective date (1999) award, I submitted a request to be compensated for the past period that my dependent child was eligible.

Within one month, the claim went to notification and then returned to under review. It has since been closed as of July 22, 2021 ."

When did you get the 2019  EED BVA award letter?

I assume this is in formal  appeal status at your RO?

 

*

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use